Question:
Sprint Moto Q 9c or Samsung Ace?
Me
2008-02-17 18:35:57 UTC
The bad news. The new Samsung Ace that came out today is $199. The good news, the Moto Q 9c is only $99 now. Which should I get?! I don't think there will be very many Ace owners, so if you own the Q 9c give me an argument. The size is very important to me. I guess I will have to hold one in my hands tomorrow to really tell, but I'm not a very big person (5'8" 135 lbs) and need to be able to comfortably carry the phone in a pocket, not on a belt clip. Besides the size of the Samsung Ace, what else does it have that the Q 9c doesn't? Thanks.
Three answers:
Series of Tubes...
2008-02-18 15:21:33 UTC
I was in the same situation, and I just purchased the Moto Q 9c because I found no reason to spend twice as much on the Samsung Ace. The Ace's biggest selling point is that it can roam on GSM networks when you are out of the country. I, however, do not travel enough to justify the cost. Plus, it is probably just as cost effective for me to buy a cheap pay as you go phone while I am abroad.



The Moto Q also has a GPS, which is not listed (by Sprint) as a feature of the Samsung Ace.



One downside to the Moto Q: I'm purchasing the slim battery for $20 online because I want the phone to be slimmer than it is. Sprint ships the extended battery, which gets amazing life, but sticks out.
anonymous
2016-10-19 15:06:17 UTC
I heard that the rumor and rant have been distinctly good. I certainly have a samsung gravity from t cellular and my chum has a rumor, and that they are distinctly comparable and all I ever do is textual content fabric. xD
anonymous
2008-02-17 18:46:25 UTC
i'd go with the Samsung Ace. i'm also looking for a new phone. but i cannot convince myself to go through and buy it.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...