Question:
Nokia Lumia 620 or Nokia Lumia 520?
anonymous
2013-04-15 00:27:21 UTC
i'm gonna buy a phone.
Which phone is best in means of display..
I know the 620 has only 3.8inches.. Is it tooo small?
And is a big difference between 620 and 520 in display size.. Ya, i know is .2inches..
Did we feel 620, is too smaller than 520??
And the pixel densities?? Which is more crisp and clear??
620 doesn't have scratchresistant glass, right?? Is it a big problem in means of display?? Is there any alternatives??

Which one has more sensitive touchsceen
*i'll appreciate the best answer.. With points
Seven answers:
anonymous
2013-04-17 04:14:31 UTC
Most reviews agree that 620 display is brighter and clearer than 520. You won't notice the difference in size. I have a 620 which is the bargain of the century. How do Apple get away with it? BTW if you need downloadable maps for Nokia Drive, on 520 you're restricted to your home country whereas on 620 you've got the whole world.
?
2016-12-18 08:17:45 UTC
Nokia Lumia 620 Display
X1123
2013-04-17 04:45:31 UTC
Lumia 520 released more recent (April 2013) and 620 released earlier in January 2013. 520 have scratch resistant glass, 620 have NOT. 520 WITHOUT front camera, 620 have front camera. Both using similar CPU Snapdragon S4, 512 MB Ram, 8 GB Internal Storage, GPU Adreno 305. On hardware both are identical. On size, 520 is 4.0 inch, 620 is 3.8 inch. In my opinion 4 inch display is the most fit for one hand usage, 3.8 inch bit smaller. Considering the price 520 is cheaper, I would like to have 520 than 620, unless u need the feature in 620 i.e video chat, video calling. For entry level of smart phone usage (No video calls), 520 will be more affordable. Clear Black display in 620 is better for outdoor usage, 520 is usable still for outdoor :)
anonymous
2013-04-15 01:14:38 UTC
Whether the device is too small is up to you.

The Lumia 620 is smaller, therefore it has greater pixel density. The Lumia 620 also has ClearBlack display - so it actually reduces glare from the sun, has better viewing angles.

They both have scratch-resistant screens and both have a super sensitive screen.
?
2017-01-04 13:02:01 UTC
i think of 520 is a extra constructive purchase in case you don't desire a too fancy telephone, and yet want candy concepts. The hardware in the two is comparable. it incredibly is merely the determination, NFC, front digicam and the LED flash Lumia 520 lacks over 620. Plus, the comments say that it incredibly is a solid purchase, and well worth. For starters to dwelling house windows telephone, it incredibly is an exceedingly intense high quality, low-priced and needed telephone.
Sathish
2013-12-26 09:34:41 UTC
Nokia lumia 620 Cons: Battery not good; phone freezing sometimes when in standby; call quality is good but sound is low even when kept in full volume; no file manager; unresponsive touch screen sometimes; wifi will not remain connected in standby; most of the apps are not working properly in wp8 os.



Me and my friends facing these problems. Dont go for wp8. Im using this mobile for past 6 months. Go for sony android mobiles or go for apple mobiles.
?
2013-12-28 22:35:19 UTC
Get the 520 for cost, 620 for a little more cost but more features. My review of the Nokia 520. Love this phone! :)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91z4BjTLTVo



Here's a video with sensitivity. Pretty sensitive ;)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XK815T_rr-8

Hope this helped you out! If this helped, be sure to check out MY YouTube channel! :) Thanks :) http://www.youtube.com/tylerschoulte


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...